Why are there different types of. For all companies and organizations, software maintenance is an essential part of the software development lifecycle. This is not something that one can omit or avoid. It is absolutely necessary for the success of your software and for any evolution into the future.
It's important to know that maintenance should go far beyond troubleshooting problems or errors, that is, just one step in the software maintenance process. Software maintenance is a natural part of the software development lifecycle (SDLC). Software developers can't afford to launch a product and let it work, they must be constantly vigilant in correcting and improving their software to remain competitive and relevant. Preventive maintenance aims to detect and fix problems before they occur.
It is usually carried out in the form of regular inspections, which usually occur several times a year. The main benefit of preventive maintenance is that it can eliminate unplanned downtime, since the ideal is to detect problems before they occur. Condition-based maintenance is sometimes considered a more advanced alternative to preventive maintenance. Instead of being inspected according to a schedule, machines and systems are carefully observed for changes that may indicate imminent failure.
With condition-based maintenance, technicians observe system operation and identify variables that could affect operation, such as temperature, vibration speed, power, presence or absence of moisture, etc. Another strategy within condition-based maintenance is predictive maintenance. Predictive maintenance refers to a specific type of condition-based maintenance in which systems are constantly observed through sensor devices. These devices connect to system components and provide constant, real-time data to the software.
The software then interprets this data and warns service technicians that hazards are approaching. Predictive maintenance is generally considered to be the most advanced and intensive type of maintenance. This is because there is a lot of data to interpret, and the sensor devices themselves need to be maintained and verified regularly. Corrective maintenance starts when a problem is discovered while working on another work order.
With corrective maintenance, problems are detected “just in time”. For example, during a scheduled maintenance check or while another problem is being fixed, a service technician realizes that a pipe in an HVAC system is not working as it should. Corrective maintenance is scheduled for a future date when the problem is repaired or replaced. Because corrective maintenance issues are detected “just in time”, emergency repairs are reduced and employee safety is increased.
Unlike other styles, default maintenance is performed using rules and suggestions created by the original manufacturer, rather than the maintenance team. These suggestions are based on experiments and data collected. Relying only on a pre-determined program can run the risk of system failure, as technicians may not be able to anticipate problems. It can also cause multifamily maintenance teams to replace parts too soon, leading to additional costs.
In addition, default maintenance does not guarantee that a system will not break down, since the program is based on statistics and not on the actual state of the equipment. I don't think you can, fundamentally, predictive maintenance is the same as condition-based maintenance, since it aims to prevent or, at least, mitigate the effect of a failure before the failure occurs. Corrective software maintenance is what would normally be associated with maintenance of any kind. Reactive maintenance is a maintenance system that responds when machinery or systems fail.
I prefer to use the distinction between reactive and proactive more around the general maintenance culture rather than maintenance tasks. When creating new software and undertaking maintenance projects for older models, software companies should consider software maintenance costs. However, the problem is that most people think of traditional time-based maintenance when talking about preventive maintenance. Therefore, emergency maintenance is the only type of maintenance that we really want to avoid as much as possible.
Risk-based maintenance (RBM) is when you use a risk assessment methodology to allocate your scarce maintenance resources to those assets that carry the greatest risk in the event of failure (remembering that %3D probability x consequence risk). However, since I am often asked questions about the different types of maintenance, I decided to give a quick summary of the types of maintenance. For condition-based maintenance and predictive maintenance, for example, sensors mounted on your assets and equipment capture a constant stream of data that you can use to help determine when to schedule upcoming inspections and maintenance tasks. Default maintenance is simply following the manufacturer's recommendations for maintenance, including when to perform inspections and maintenance.
The opposite of planned maintenance is unplanned maintenance that has not been properly prepared and is planned in the plan as the work is done. . .